Olympics Brand Exclusion Zone

In urban design, exclusion zones are becoming commonplace in relation to sponsorship of sporting events. The Brand Exclusion Zone is the newest form of urban demarcation, and can be used not only to affect signage and advertising, but also restrict personal freedom of choice. Within this context, the London 2012 Olympics represents one of the most radical restructuring of the rights of the city in London. The ‘canvas’ of London will belong exclusively to the Olympic marquee brands.

In essence, London has abdicated all rights and responsibilities to the International Olympic Committee, and implemented legislation which creates radical new spatial demarcations not only within the Olympic Park, but because of the distributed nature of the Olympic venues, across the whole of central London. London has surrendered the traditional rights to the city to the demands of the Olympic ‘family’ and their corporate paymasters. What the IOC want, London will give. London will be on brand lockdown.

via Kosmograd: Olympics Brand Exclusion Zone.

This is horrible: there really isn’t more to say about the continual erosion of the public sphere to private commerce. The Olympics has, and continue to be an excuse to market products with a thin veneer of athletic competition as an afterthought.

Also note the O2 Arena, shown above, will be called the North Greenwich Arena. Something I’m sure O2 is thrilled about.

Alternative London 2012 Olympics Logo

Daniel Eatock Alt. Olympic 2012 Logo

Alternative Olympic 2012 Logos by Daniel Eatock. Both alternative logos are a composite of two icons: the Olympic Rings, created in 1913 by Pierre de Coubertin and the RAF Roundel, associated with British pop art of the 1960s, appearing in paintings by Jasper Johns and Peter Blake.

The first alternative logo features equal sized rings and the second alternative logo features the five colored rings and the white space that separates them all with the same surface area.